Sunday, March 30, 2003
From my friend M: all those stupid jokes about micro$oft products rolled into one page. It's good, honest.
Labels:
general
Hysterical new piece (although I do think that news journalists shouldn't be allowed access to the exclamation mark key).
This bloke, Carlssin claims to have time-traveled from the future, to take advantage of our era's "worst stock plunges in history". The SEC caught up with him after 118 consecutive trades where he turned $800 into $350m in only two weeks. Beginner's luck?
Obviously, he might turn out to be Michael J Fox with financial whizz-kidery, and then we'll all be laughing the other side of our faces. But this is the best bit:
In a bid for leniency, Carlssin has reportedly offered to divulge "historical facts" such as the whereabouts of Osama Bin Laden and a cure for AIDS.
That'll learn 'em.
[via Kookymojo]
This bloke, Carlssin claims to have time-traveled from the future, to take advantage of our era's "worst stock plunges in history". The SEC caught up with him after 118 consecutive trades where he turned $800 into $350m in only two weeks. Beginner's luck?
Obviously, he might turn out to be Michael J Fox with financial whizz-kidery, and then we'll all be laughing the other side of our faces. But this is the best bit:
In a bid for leniency, Carlssin has reportedly offered to divulge "historical facts" such as the whereabouts of Osama Bin Laden and a cure for AIDS.
That'll learn 'em.
[via Kookymojo]
Labels:
general
Friday, March 28, 2003
Does anyone know how to get real information from the train people? I'm supposed to be at a meeting in Sutton Coldfield on Monday morning and neither thetrainline.com nor the phone people know which trains are running or when. Do you think it'll be chaos on the M1/M6?
Labels:
general
And got home early enough last night to fall asleep to Newsnight. But not before I'd seen Yasmin Alibhai Brown accuse a female Iraqui audience member, who'd talked about being inprisoned and serially raped by the current regime, and how much the Iraqui people want the war, of "emotional blackmail." Put aside issues of right/wrong/war/peace, Alibhai Brown is just plain rude: she doesn't let anyone finish a sentence and throws her toys out of her pram if someone interrupts her.
Labels:
general
So after I got my Sony Vaio back - I feel like the junior doctor in ER who brought the patient back after the senior doctors had "called it" - I returned the CD drive and external floppy drive to my Dad, because I had installed my Disgo (and don't all start singing D - I - S - G - O, willya?). Except it randomly stopped reading it, and the WIFI network is broken so I can't get it offline, and it needs a floppy drive. The original had a stupid proprietary port, but there's also a USB port, so I ordered an OEM external floppy drive off Dabs for twenty quid. Just arrived: guess what (you probably knew this) - it comes with the drivers on a CD-ROM.
I think it may be time to say goodbye to this machine.
I think it may be time to say goodbye to this machine.
Labels:
general
Friday Night With Jonathan Ross
Was in the audience for this last night at BBC TV Centre in White City, which is frankly a bugger to get to with the Central Line down. Amazing evening: after a lot of hanging around, we were ushered in, and Jonathan Ross welcomed us personally! Jonathan clasped my shoulder warmly and said "welcome to the show." He spoke to me.
Great guest line-up: "that bloke off The Office" who played Tim (he called him that so much that I can't remember his real name), Jo Brand and Yoko Ono. Yep, I've been in the same room (OK, studio, as Yoko Ono). Tim was great, with lots of banter about Jonathan being mates with Ricky Gervais, and could give as good as he got. Jo Brand was - as ever - a real laugh, and said that she'd given Trinny and Susannah a hard time, which I'm sorry I've missed. She's touring in April/May, and she'll have new material when she's written it.
But Yoko Ono. First of all, you can't believe she's seventy: she turns up in a whole hip leather ensemble, and kept - for some reason - lifting up her t-shirt and flashing Jonathan. While she's clearly an icon of some sort, she's utterly humourless, and Jonathan spent a long time talking to her, because she just didn't get a lot of what he said. It comes across like some kind of language barrier, but I suspect she took too mnay drugs during the sixties. She's just bought Lennon's childhood home in Liverpool for approximately £150k and given it to the National Trust, to save it from becoming a B&B. She was fascinating: clearly sees herself as both some kind of installation artist, as well as the guardian of the perfect memory of John Lennon status as the prophet for the twenty-first century (as in all religions have a prophet). I hope they leave in a mad bit where Jonathan talks to her about pottering, and she starts pacing the stage.
Show rounded off with live music from Moloko, "Forever More". Fab sound, but I had an extreme desire to send the lead singer off with Trinny and Susannah, or at the very least, me. She was wearing a strange, cheaply-cut, eighties-skirt-version-of-a-boiler-suit, with a slit up the front, and some kind of billowing parachute at the back, with floppy boots that made her knees look fat (and that's hard). She looked like she'd gone down to Stockport Market in 1983 with her spending money and this was all she could get. Someone tell her.
Anyway, watch tonight.
Was in the audience for this last night at BBC TV Centre in White City, which is frankly a bugger to get to with the Central Line down. Amazing evening: after a lot of hanging around, we were ushered in, and Jonathan Ross welcomed us personally! Jonathan clasped my shoulder warmly and said "welcome to the show." He spoke to me.
Great guest line-up: "that bloke off The Office" who played Tim (he called him that so much that I can't remember his real name), Jo Brand and Yoko Ono. Yep, I've been in the same room (OK, studio, as Yoko Ono). Tim was great, with lots of banter about Jonathan being mates with Ricky Gervais, and could give as good as he got. Jo Brand was - as ever - a real laugh, and said that she'd given Trinny and Susannah a hard time, which I'm sorry I've missed. She's touring in April/May, and she'll have new material when she's written it.
But Yoko Ono. First of all, you can't believe she's seventy: she turns up in a whole hip leather ensemble, and kept - for some reason - lifting up her t-shirt and flashing Jonathan. While she's clearly an icon of some sort, she's utterly humourless, and Jonathan spent a long time talking to her, because she just didn't get a lot of what he said. It comes across like some kind of language barrier, but I suspect she took too mnay drugs during the sixties. She's just bought Lennon's childhood home in Liverpool for approximately £150k and given it to the National Trust, to save it from becoming a B&B. She was fascinating: clearly sees herself as both some kind of installation artist, as well as the guardian of the perfect memory of John Lennon status as the prophet for the twenty-first century (as in all religions have a prophet). I hope they leave in a mad bit where Jonathan talks to her about pottering, and she starts pacing the stage.
Show rounded off with live music from Moloko, "Forever More". Fab sound, but I had an extreme desire to send the lead singer off with Trinny and Susannah, or at the very least, me. She was wearing a strange, cheaply-cut, eighties-skirt-version-of-a-boiler-suit, with a slit up the front, and some kind of billowing parachute at the back, with floppy boots that made her knees look fat (and that's hard). She looked like she'd gone down to Stockport Market in 1983 with her spending money and this was all she could get. Someone tell her.
Anyway, watch tonight.
Labels:
general
Thursday, March 27, 2003
Art Deco update
Was (almost) first in the queue this morning, collecting my brand-spanking new (gift from M) Friend of the V&A membership. Great exhibition: covers the influences of the deco style, rebuilds the Rhulmann room from the 1925 exhibition, and the original entrance to the Strand Palace Hotel (not seen since it was almost destroyed in 1969). For my tastes, would have had more twenties clothes (there was a fantastic showcase of post-Vionnet thirties bias-cute dresses) - there was only one "flapper" dress, which was originally on show in the 1925 exhibition, and I would have had more "mainstream stuff" - the furniture and mid-market jewellery of the era. But I'll be back.
In fact, now I am a friend, if any fellow Deco-lovers want to see the exhibit, providing - if we don't already know each other - you pass a rigorous e-mail security questionnaire (that's mostly for the benefit of my family-readers, who are bound to say "how can you meet someone you don't know?), let's do it. Mail me.
Was (almost) first in the queue this morning, collecting my brand-spanking new (gift from M) Friend of the V&A membership. Great exhibition: covers the influences of the deco style, rebuilds the Rhulmann room from the 1925 exhibition, and the original entrance to the Strand Palace Hotel (not seen since it was almost destroyed in 1969). For my tastes, would have had more twenties clothes (there was a fantastic showcase of post-Vionnet thirties bias-cute dresses) - there was only one "flapper" dress, which was originally on show in the 1925 exhibition, and I would have had more "mainstream stuff" - the furniture and mid-market jewellery of the era. But I'll be back.
In fact, now I am a friend, if any fellow Deco-lovers want to see the exhibit, providing - if we don't already know each other - you pass a rigorous e-mail security questionnaire (that's mostly for the benefit of my family-readers, who are bound to say "how can you meet someone you don't know?), let's do it. Mail me.
Labels:
general
Fame at last
Sorta. People come here from far and wide to find the solution to that pesky SymRealWinOpen error (basically a Java error created by using Norton firewall with Blogger, go figure. Turn off your firewall before you edit your template and you're OK, though you have to make sure you've taken out the offending code from previously edited versions). Now, I am linked from a Dutch webdesign forum. I have arrived, in a web-friendly kinda way.
Sorta. People come here from far and wide to find the solution to that pesky SymRealWinOpen error (basically a Java error created by using Norton firewall with Blogger, go figure. Turn off your firewall before you edit your template and you're OK, though you have to make sure you've taken out the offending code from previously edited versions). Now, I am linked from a Dutch webdesign forum. I have arrived, in a web-friendly kinda way.
Labels:
general
Wednesday, March 26, 2003
Here's a thing. It's Passover/Pesach over Easter, and I'm spending most of it in Manchester, but the last two days back in London, because I've got some work to do on the Friday. Friends locally have invited me to stay, so I don't even have to do the whole Pesach cleaning thing (my Mum used to sit down, exhausted, on the first Seder night and say "call this a festival of freedom?" and she has a point).
Yesterday, I get email from one of their neighbours claiming to be mounting a reverse takeover bid for X&Y's Pesach lunch (which I think means that we're all invited over to the neighbour's house). I would reprint it here, but I don't think I - morally - can without their permission. Let's just say, while it was entertaining, business must be slow if they have time to craft such humour during the working day.
Yesterday, I get email from one of their neighbours claiming to be mounting a reverse takeover bid for X&Y's Pesach lunch (which I think means that we're all invited over to the neighbour's house). I would reprint it here, but I don't think I - morally - can without their permission. Let's just say, while it was entertaining, business must be slow if they have time to craft such humour during the working day.
Labels:
general
FT.fabulous_customer_service
I feel it's only fair to say, after yesterday's post, that a bunch of IT people at the FT have responded with high speed to my problem, after getting a screen shot, and have now solved it. What was it? Norton's ad-blocking. Which is also (well, the firewall, anyway) giving me terrible gyp with Moveable Type, too. Any ideas?
I feel it's only fair to say, after yesterday's post, that a bunch of IT people at the FT have responded with high speed to my problem, after getting a screen shot, and have now solved it. What was it? Norton's ad-blocking. Which is also (well, the firewall, anyway) giving me terrible gyp with Moveable Type, too. Any ideas?
Labels:
general
Virgin? Shmirgin
So Virgin Trains usually release their 14-day advance tickets six to eight weeks before the date. I've called a couple of times - I'm going home for Passover over Easter - and keep being fobbed off that the ticket allocation will be released "tomorrow". Yesterday they said today, and today they said they have no f***ing idea at all. So I called Virgin Customer Relations (0870 789 1234) who tell me it's because, apparently, Network Rail haven't told them for months whether scheduled engineering works will be going ahead or not. And you just know that the minute the tickets are released it'll be the day you don't phone up and you'll be buggered and have to pay £49 instead of £10. Which I resent: the service gets worse and the prices go up.
So I called Network Rail (whose website is still called railtrack.co.uk), and after a couple of dead ends, speak to the Chief Engineer's secretary, who tells me that decision would be made by the track, rather than structure people, in the North West zone. Sadly, the only number she has is the press office - so far I have skillfully managed to avoid all people with community, customer or public affairs in their job-title, who invariably are full of PR puff, and say things like "they don't talk to members of the public" or "can you put your query in writing". Nice woman in the press office tells me: it's not their decision: all that information comes from Virign Trains Customer Relations. Would I like the number? 0870 789 1234.
I judged from her tone that there's clearly something political going on but I guess I'll just have to let this one go.
So Virgin Trains usually release their 14-day advance tickets six to eight weeks before the date. I've called a couple of times - I'm going home for Passover over Easter - and keep being fobbed off that the ticket allocation will be released "tomorrow". Yesterday they said today, and today they said they have no f***ing idea at all. So I called Virgin Customer Relations (0870 789 1234) who tell me it's because, apparently, Network Rail haven't told them for months whether scheduled engineering works will be going ahead or not. And you just know that the minute the tickets are released it'll be the day you don't phone up and you'll be buggered and have to pay £49 instead of £10. Which I resent: the service gets worse and the prices go up.
So I called Network Rail (whose website is still called railtrack.co.uk), and after a couple of dead ends, speak to the Chief Engineer's secretary, who tells me that decision would be made by the track, rather than structure people, in the North West zone. Sadly, the only number she has is the press office - so far I have skillfully managed to avoid all people with community, customer or public affairs in their job-title, who invariably are full of PR puff, and say things like "they don't talk to members of the public" or "can you put your query in writing". Nice woman in the press office tells me: it's not their decision: all that information comes from Virign Trains Customer Relations. Would I like the number? 0870 789 1234.
I judged from her tone that there's clearly something political going on but I guess I'll just have to let this one go.
Labels:
general
I just discovered the Be Good Tanyas as muzak at the Gate in Belsize Park. Blue Horse - mindblowingly mellow.
Labels:
general
Someone left this leaflet on my car - gas masks are only £99. Well that's a relief then: well within the reach of everyone, and guaranteed to work, to boot:
How long will a gas mask protect me?
The effectiveness of a gas mask depends on a range of factors, including but not limited to: the hazard encountered, the concentration of that hazard, the filter type being used and the breathing rate of the wearer. Depending on circumstances, a mask could be effective for minutes or hours.
So, er, that's not very long at all, then. And what about the rest of your body. I read somewhere, but can't find it, that masks are useless without whole suits, and this whole industry is preying on people's insecurities.
How long will a gas mask protect me?
The effectiveness of a gas mask depends on a range of factors, including but not limited to: the hazard encountered, the concentration of that hazard, the filter type being used and the breathing rate of the wearer. Depending on circumstances, a mask could be effective for minutes or hours.
So, er, that's not very long at all, then. And what about the rest of your body. I read somewhere, but can't find it, that masks are useless without whole suits, and this whole industry is preying on people's insecurities.
Labels:
general
Tuesday, March 25, 2003
But of course what I still haven't done is work out which is the best tarriff for me - tarriff inertia. Still there.
Labels:
general
Good Customer Service Karma
Friday, my 8310 finally packs up for good. For a coupla months it's been all odd - in the middle of any important conversation it would randomly stop reading the SIM card, and the battery life was getting silly. And of course it's always had that stupid text-message bug where it crashes when you press send. It's like they fixed the squashy screen problem from the 8210, but gave you a new bug instead. I figured I couldnt be bothered to sort it, but then Friday it stopped both ringing and vibrating - the only way you could tell someone was calling was by looking at the phone.
That's not good, really. I called Customer Service, and they put me through to diagnostics (AKA asked me a bunch of questions), and then told me my phone was defective. Like, DUH. That's why I called. They would replace it but, I don't have any insurance, so it's either £X00 for a new phone, or £70 one-off insurance fee to replace it and go on the insurance plan with a £2 monthly fee.
But I know this game - I'm your telecoms fairy godmother, really. I was so sure my phone came with insurance in July, because that's what they told me. So I just said those magic words "I'll have to leave Orange, then, if ....", and they put me through to the rentention department, who waived the £70, and sent out a phone the next day. Same model of course, still can't text. BUt good karma, nonetheless. You know when you're poised for lots of yelling and shouting and then you just get what you want anyway?
Friday, my 8310 finally packs up for good. For a coupla months it's been all odd - in the middle of any important conversation it would randomly stop reading the SIM card, and the battery life was getting silly. And of course it's always had that stupid text-message bug where it crashes when you press send. It's like they fixed the squashy screen problem from the 8210, but gave you a new bug instead. I figured I couldnt be bothered to sort it, but then Friday it stopped both ringing and vibrating - the only way you could tell someone was calling was by looking at the phone.
That's not good, really. I called Customer Service, and they put me through to diagnostics (AKA asked me a bunch of questions), and then told me my phone was defective. Like, DUH. That's why I called. They would replace it but, I don't have any insurance, so it's either £X00 for a new phone, or £70 one-off insurance fee to replace it and go on the insurance plan with a £2 monthly fee.
But I know this game - I'm your telecoms fairy godmother, really. I was so sure my phone came with insurance in July, because that's what they told me. So I just said those magic words "I'll have to leave Orange, then, if ....", and they put me through to the rentention department, who waived the £70, and sent out a phone the next day. Same model of course, still can't text. BUt good karma, nonetheless. You know when you're poised for lots of yelling and shouting and then you just get what you want anyway?
Labels:
general
FT.crap
So I persuaded a client to give me a second level FT.com subscription (the one with all the bells and whistles and mulitple information sources) as a kinda-bonus and because I'm an information junkie.
Password came this morning - I rush to log on, but when I go to advanced search, there's no search box. I reload - still no search box. I call the helpline, and Alan helpfully tells me there's a problem with searching in IE, particularly IE6. I point out that it's the essence of the product. I ask him how long they've had this problem. A month. A month! I retort. Yes, they feed it back to product development, but they don't seem to know what the problem is. If I'd paid for my subscription, I'd certainly feel that it'd been mis-sold and I'd want my money back. If I'd paid for my subscription, Alan tells me, I should get it put on hold. It's fine with other browsers, he tells me.
So I try Mozilla, and it's the same, and he asks me "if I have any other browsers". I point out that Netscape is Mozilla. I say I'm frustrated and disappointed. He says he understands where I'm coming from, but there's nothing he can do. I get the names of people up the food chain - Ian Cohen, IT Director, and Ian Gill (called FT site manager by the helpline, but actually Head of Service Development). Ian Cohen's secretary says of course it works, someone will call me back. Admittedly, that was only ten minutes ago. Watch this space.
I can't help feeling that this is bad customer service karma to offset my slight un-humility over dinner last night (at The Gate in Belsize Park - unbelievable vegetarian food), about two great customer serviceexperiences I've had this year. What goes around comes around.
Update:In the time it took to write that last paragraph, Ian Cohen's secretary has been back on to me to get Alan's details. "Of course the site works", she tells me. Can't help feeling Alan's for the high-jump, but hey, at least they're on to it.
So I persuaded a client to give me a second level FT.com subscription (the one with all the bells and whistles and mulitple information sources) as a kinda-bonus and because I'm an information junkie.
Password came this morning - I rush to log on, but when I go to advanced search, there's no search box. I reload - still no search box. I call the helpline, and Alan helpfully tells me there's a problem with searching in IE, particularly IE6. I point out that it's the essence of the product. I ask him how long they've had this problem. A month. A month! I retort. Yes, they feed it back to product development, but they don't seem to know what the problem is. If I'd paid for my subscription, I'd certainly feel that it'd been mis-sold and I'd want my money back. If I'd paid for my subscription, Alan tells me, I should get it put on hold. It's fine with other browsers, he tells me.
So I try Mozilla, and it's the same, and he asks me "if I have any other browsers". I point out that Netscape is Mozilla. I say I'm frustrated and disappointed. He says he understands where I'm coming from, but there's nothing he can do. I get the names of people up the food chain - Ian Cohen, IT Director, and Ian Gill (called FT site manager by the helpline, but actually Head of Service Development). Ian Cohen's secretary says of course it works, someone will call me back. Admittedly, that was only ten minutes ago. Watch this space.
I can't help feeling that this is bad customer service karma to offset my slight un-humility over dinner last night (at The Gate in Belsize Park - unbelievable vegetarian food), about two great customer serviceexperiences I've had this year. What goes around comes around.
Update:In the time it took to write that last paragraph, Ian Cohen's secretary has been back on to me to get Alan's details. "Of course the site works", she tells me. Can't help feeling Alan's for the high-jump, but hey, at least they're on to it.
Labels:
general
I can't help feeling that the clocks have changed without me noticing - I've had three phone calls already this morning, and it's only 8.15. None of them prefaced their remarks with "sorry to call so early..."
Labels:
general
Sunday, March 23, 2003
Equilibrium
Saw this tonight at the mostly-plastic O2 centre, after a butterscotch malt shake at Ed's Easy Diner. (We felt so 1953, although it's not been the same since I found out where they get their furniture from).
Equilibrium is a scream: it's 1984 meets The Matrix, it's Prozac Nation meets the Muji catalogue, it's "Bond, James Bond" meets every recent Madonna video. It's cliche-ridden in an oh-so-clever refferential wank fest; you can hardly watch the action for spotting the action-movie reference. The audience to a man - and yes, they were mostly men - loved it: spontaneous clapping at the end of two outrageously unlikely one-to-many fight scenes. The hipper-than-thou crowd (pretty much all wearing their gatkes (trousers) round their pupik (belly button - although hips, in this case), were post-hip to a DJ, you just knew they all had at least one X-box apiece) lapped it up. The goodies turn into the baddies and back again, but thankfully in the last scene Christian (Bale - looking very faux-Tom Cruise) wears a white suit to make things easier.
If you don't care about plot, love special effects fight scenes, can live without a serious love-interest, can handle poor characterisation, accept the fact that the protaganist has no real motivation as a character, and that the basic premise of the film is fatally flawed (in the post-Saddam future, sense crimes, ie feeling any emotion, are a capital offence, except the people who find them intuit it. Like, yeah, that's not a feeling), then this is great Sunday night entertainment - although will be much better on video/DVD because you'll be able to go straight to the cartoon violence.
Saw this tonight at the mostly-plastic O2 centre, after a butterscotch malt shake at Ed's Easy Diner. (We felt so 1953, although it's not been the same since I found out where they get their furniture from).
Equilibrium is a scream: it's 1984 meets The Matrix, it's Prozac Nation meets the Muji catalogue, it's "Bond, James Bond" meets every recent Madonna video. It's cliche-ridden in an oh-so-clever refferential wank fest; you can hardly watch the action for spotting the action-movie reference. The audience to a man - and yes, they were mostly men - loved it: spontaneous clapping at the end of two outrageously unlikely one-to-many fight scenes. The hipper-than-thou crowd (pretty much all wearing their gatkes (trousers) round their pupik (belly button - although hips, in this case), were post-hip to a DJ, you just knew they all had at least one X-box apiece) lapped it up. The goodies turn into the baddies and back again, but thankfully in the last scene Christian (Bale - looking very faux-Tom Cruise) wears a white suit to make things easier.
If you don't care about plot, love special effects fight scenes, can live without a serious love-interest, can handle poor characterisation, accept the fact that the protaganist has no real motivation as a character, and that the basic premise of the film is fatally flawed (in the post-Saddam future, sense crimes, ie feeling any emotion, are a capital offence, except the people who find them intuit it. Like, yeah, that's not a feeling), then this is great Sunday night entertainment - although will be much better on video/DVD because you'll be able to go straight to the cartoon violence.
Labels:
general
Saturday, March 22, 2003
Just watching a docu-doodar about the seventies before I go out, and this combined with news about the war, marches et al, puts me in a strange mood. A puts it so muich better (he's an academic):
"...feel I'm in a time warp. Students wearing flared pants are sitting amidst the daffodils on the lawn outside my window, the Marxists are shouting "I, 2, 3, 4, time to stop the f***king war", the hippies are singing "Give peace a chance" ... and rather worryingly, in the distance someone seems to be testing an air raid siren. Strange times."
"...feel I'm in a time warp. Students wearing flared pants are sitting amidst the daffodils on the lawn outside my window, the Marxists are shouting "I, 2, 3, 4, time to stop the f***king war", the hippies are singing "Give peace a chance" ... and rather worryingly, in the distance someone seems to be testing an air raid siren. Strange times."
Labels:
general
Friday, March 21, 2003
The strange vicissitudes of those in the creative arts: Stephen Pollard is truly hysterical today.
Labels:
general
Well, I finally managed to procure some Lanique Rose Petal vodka (which is apparently going out of style/production, which would explain why it doesn't feature on the Lancut site). It's like liquid turkish delight, and as pink as that revolting stuff they make you wash your mouth out with at the dentist.
Labels:
general
Thursday, March 20, 2003
There's a bomb scare at Cavendish Square on a number 25 bus. So much for not going on the underground.
And, of course, it enhances the ongoing bus-theme of my life.
Update: 1245 - it lasted about an hour. My local informant has lived to fight another day at the forefront of pharmaceutical strategy development.
And, of course, it enhances the ongoing bus-theme of my life.
Update: 1245 - it lasted about an hour. My local informant has lived to fight another day at the forefront of pharmaceutical strategy development.
Labels:
general
And I Ask Myself: How Did I Get Here?
Tired this morning, as I was up late watching the war, and then - extremely rarely - actually couldn't sleep worrying about it. Yesterday, I called my Dad for some reassurance, and he replied "I'm a fatalist: if your number's up, your numbers up". That was useful. Then, last night, T said that M had persuaded her that there might be a scare about something in the water.
Check out the Home Office website:
It is sensible to be prepared for any emergency in the home and to make plans for any major disruption, including severe weather and floods.
In any type of emergency, you could lose access to power, water, telephones, and roads. Therefore:
Have on hand such items as:
Have the phone numbers of your local police, council, utility companies and family members handy in one place.
Here's a few problems: what's the point in having phone numbers on hand when you "could lose access to telephones"? And what have severe weather and floods got to do with terrorism? Or is Saddam/whoever godly on the weather front now, too?
And what is the war? Some kind of bizarre fancy dress party where you have to make a costume out of a blanket, water bottles, batteries and the like. The Tin Man for the twentyfirst century?
Here's what worries me - for some reason, I feel that in the case of acts of terrorism or war, everyone should return to their birthplace (Manchester in my case), but obviously with all the transport infrastructure out, how will I get there? And maybe at times like this, it's only family that counts. I have some second cousins in East Finchley, maybe they would take me in? And then I think, my immediate family, we're not always that great at Rosh Hashannah: like all families, when we're locked in a house together, we're bound to argue. How much worse would it be in a sealed room?
I'm worried that all my friends locally, when the chips are down, would be all on-yer-bike, looking after their own, and I'd have to get into my sealed room on my own. (Of course when I said this last night, my friends immediately said I should come over to their house if there's a war, and if there's not, could I at least come for Pesach). Last night we also talked about the wind-up radio thing: I explained that it's better, as your batteries might run out, and M said, by the time the batteries have run out, surely you'll be completely out of bottled water and Heinz baked beans. I'm scared.
Of course I may be over-reacting, but times like these make me think about what's truly important: family, good friends. I may have a nice house, and car, and my own personal bus shelter, but what it really comes down to is, do you love? Are you loved? It's like the global version of "would they hide you from the Nazis?" but with a universalist edge, some kind of bizarre Reality TV game, only it's really real, and it's not on TV.
Tired this morning, as I was up late watching the war, and then - extremely rarely - actually couldn't sleep worrying about it. Yesterday, I called my Dad for some reassurance, and he replied "I'm a fatalist: if your number's up, your numbers up". That was useful. Then, last night, T said that M had persuaded her that there might be a scare about something in the water.
Check out the Home Office website:
It is sensible to be prepared for any emergency in the home and to make plans for any major disruption, including severe weather and floods.
In any type of emergency, you could lose access to power, water, telephones, and roads. Therefore:
Have on hand such items as:
- batteries
- a battery-powered torch
- a battery-powered or wind-up radio
- some ready-to-eat food, e.g. tinned food
- bottled water
- blankets
Have the phone numbers of your local police, council, utility companies and family members handy in one place.
Here's a few problems: what's the point in having phone numbers on hand when you "could lose access to telephones"? And what have severe weather and floods got to do with terrorism? Or is Saddam/whoever godly on the weather front now, too?
And what is the war? Some kind of bizarre fancy dress party where you have to make a costume out of a blanket, water bottles, batteries and the like. The Tin Man for the twentyfirst century?
Here's what worries me - for some reason, I feel that in the case of acts of terrorism or war, everyone should return to their birthplace (Manchester in my case), but obviously with all the transport infrastructure out, how will I get there? And maybe at times like this, it's only family that counts. I have some second cousins in East Finchley, maybe they would take me in? And then I think, my immediate family, we're not always that great at Rosh Hashannah: like all families, when we're locked in a house together, we're bound to argue. How much worse would it be in a sealed room?
I'm worried that all my friends locally, when the chips are down, would be all on-yer-bike, looking after their own, and I'd have to get into my sealed room on my own. (Of course when I said this last night, my friends immediately said I should come over to their house if there's a war, and if there's not, could I at least come for Pesach). Last night we also talked about the wind-up radio thing: I explained that it's better, as your batteries might run out, and M said, by the time the batteries have run out, surely you'll be completely out of bottled water and Heinz baked beans. I'm scared.
Of course I may be over-reacting, but times like these make me think about what's truly important: family, good friends. I may have a nice house, and car, and my own personal bus shelter, but what it really comes down to is, do you love? Are you loved? It's like the global version of "would they hide you from the Nazis?" but with a universalist edge, some kind of bizarre Reality TV game, only it's really real, and it's not on TV.
Labels:
general
My Mum is going on a PC/internet course after a lifetime of un-tech-ness (I'm sure it's nothing to do with wanting to read my weblog). So last night, when the instructor talked through the symbols on a Word document toolbar, he said "that symbol, is for Cut and Paste."
And a woman - who may be one elf short of a grotto, or at the very least slightly out of season - said, "you mean there's glue and scissors inside that computer?"
And a woman - who may be one elf short of a grotto, or at the very least slightly out of season - said, "you mean there's glue and scissors inside that computer?"
Labels:
general
Wednesday, March 19, 2003
Just spent a delightful evening at Day of the Raj in Mill Hill, which did serve mutter paneer, which was a relief. In typical fashion we ordered far more than we could reasonably eat, and then didn't. My "women's group" as we call ourselves, is a group of women who were broadly at college or loosely connected together, and we have been meeting up kind-of-monthly for about ten years. More, maybe. We've been through a lot together.
Tonight's conversation covered everything from whether you need bottled water for the imminent war (there might be a scare), tales from the workforce coal-face, discussions about tupperware (we are all feminists, honest), Manolo Blahnik's, and the returning of S's son's shoes which he had conveniently left at some friends who live near me. I never go anywhere without a small child's pair of shoes, honestly. We're like Sex in the City, but less thin, and don't have our dialogue written by a cadre of gay men. At least, I don't think we do.
Tonight's conversation covered everything from whether you need bottled water for the imminent war (there might be a scare), tales from the workforce coal-face, discussions about tupperware (we are all feminists, honest), Manolo Blahnik's, and the returning of S's son's shoes which he had conveniently left at some friends who live near me. I never go anywhere without a small child's pair of shoes, honestly. We're like Sex in the City, but less thin, and don't have our dialogue written by a cadre of gay men. At least, I don't think we do.
Labels:
general
Bus Karma
So Monday, I met with Head of Bus Strategy, London (northbound routes). OK, I made that bit up. A nice bloke and his sidekick who sincerely discussed the proximity of bus stops on the southbound number 16 bus route, and agreed about the traffic-obscuring dangerous nature of my (current) bus shelter. Did you know it costs £6,000 to put in a bus shelter? They're terribly busy, so they'll get back to me in mid-April (hopefully 2003, unlike the NHS) with the results of their strategy review.
My friend H is a management consultant in a niche firm that's falling apart, although forunately she has lots of alternative offers on the table. Her out-of-town boss called her last night and said - in response to her hard-nosed questions about what they'd offer her to stay -
"it's not about strategy. It's about getting the right people on the bus, and seeing where the bus goes." Quite. What goes around comes around, as they say in the bus-strategy world.
So Monday, I met with Head of Bus Strategy, London (northbound routes). OK, I made that bit up. A nice bloke and his sidekick who sincerely discussed the proximity of bus stops on the southbound number 16 bus route, and agreed about the traffic-obscuring dangerous nature of my (current) bus shelter. Did you know it costs £6,000 to put in a bus shelter? They're terribly busy, so they'll get back to me in mid-April (hopefully 2003, unlike the NHS) with the results of their strategy review.
My friend H is a management consultant in a niche firm that's falling apart, although forunately she has lots of alternative offers on the table. Her out-of-town boss called her last night and said - in response to her hard-nosed questions about what they'd offer her to stay -
"it's not about strategy. It's about getting the right people on the bus, and seeing where the bus goes." Quite. What goes around comes around, as they say in the bus-strategy world.
Labels:
general
Whoops. Bit of judicious searching, and hey presto:
United Kingdom Sales Office
18 Soho Square
London W1D 3QL
phone: +011 44-2070258010
fax: +011 44-2076811995
United Kingdom Sales Office
18 Soho Square
London W1D 3QL
phone: +011 44-2070258010
fax: +011 44-2076811995
Labels:
general
Anyone know where google's UK office is? I'm figuring somewhere in W1, Soho-Squareish, but actually no idea.
Labels:
general
Realise I have been brief to the point of boring, recently. It's not that I haven't been doing anything, honest. More that I've been... oh, so busy.
I should say more about these - this is just a note. I'll fill in when I get back from my meeting.
- Chicago The Movie - as an offical twenties/thirties person, I can't believe I didn't see this earlier. It's fun, but unlike the stage play, where the sheer energy of live performance keeps you enthralled, despite it's perfection and cleverness, I got bored. I picked up my voicemail during the court scene. It's very cold - it's a satire on celebrity with songs, and that didn't really keep me going. Great costumes, though.
- Purim Megillah/Shpeil
- Limmud - did a couple of Limmud-style things recently, that made me realise quite what a fabulous organisation it is. I'm honoured to be involved.
- J & A's party - was just about to write that folk played Titanic-esque music, when I realised that's what I said last time they had a party. More DJing this time, from a host of talented proto-DJs, and J took video on his camera and put it up on the screens, so you could see the party like in two dimensions. Man.
- Friends staying for the weekend - Yand B came to hang out, and I made totally-steamed food on Friday night, but made up for it with a mezze extravaganza on Saturday.
- Aimee Mann - at the venue formerly known as the Hammersmith Appolo, but now branded like everything else in the world. She's great, but such a huge venue is at odds with her intimate, soul-ly sound. Last night of the tour, so she was very laid-back and uber-chatty between songs. I'd like to hang out with her, although that seems unlikely.
- Mslexia course - as part of the Spit-Lit week, celebrating women's writing, I went on an afternoon course about how to pitch your book to agents, which was fascinating. For both the insights, and the complete characters there. There was an older women - she "shared" that she was 85, but she only looked 83 - who wore tights that looked like fish scales and had clearly lost most of her marbles.
- Fabulous fondue - girls night in last week, best cheese fondue I've ever made. Jaq jetted in for the evening (no, obviously she was here already) - we giggled, guzzled, and put the world to rights. Wasn't even that much alcohol (apart from a ton of kirsch in the fondue).
- Maid in Manhattan - girl movie par excellence, and I mean that in a good way. Fast-paced, funny, great script, girl-power ridden, J-Lo is great, even is she does have a stupid name. There's two interesting things that grabbed me - the opening line is where she tells her son he can "google on" something at school, which was the same week I read about google trademarking their name, and allegedly suing infringers. Wonder if they got permission. Also, on the bus she's reading the Drama of Being a Child, which synchronistically, I had been discussing with B the previous weekend. Great, great, girl movie, loved it.
I should say more about these - this is just a note. I'll fill in when I get back from my meeting.
Labels:
general
Tuesday, March 18, 2003
If all Jewish festivals are losely based on the premise "they tried to kill us, we won, let's eat", then today is no exception. It's (the tail end of) Purim, where it's traditional to eat triangular shaped pastries, though frankly it's a long story that I can't go into now.
Purim Same'ach, or, as A pointed out to me, if you think that's far too modern, then gutten Purim.
Purim Same'ach, or, as A pointed out to me, if you think that's far too modern, then gutten Purim.
Labels:
general
Monday, March 17, 2003
In my head, I'd completely confused - for no good reason, just eightiesness - OMD and that seminal album, From the Hell Holes of Mars to the Tea Rooms of Uranus. Go figure.
Labels:
general
I realise this might be in slightly bad taste on world-changing War Day, but do you think weapons of mass destruction (WMD) are related to Orchestral Manouveres in the Dark? Kinda apt, if you remember Enola Gay? Or perhaps, they're like second cousins to WD40?
Labels:
general
Friday, March 14, 2003
I don't bake (bread) that often, but there's something wholesome and earthy about it, but I discovered recently that you can't buy fresh yeast anymore, apparently, because of some EU-ness. Mad, right? I mean, women in my family have been cleansing their skin with a 50/50 mixture of witch hazel and rosewater for generations, but now when I go into a pharmacy and ask them to mix it for me, they can't, because of some EU Regulation about ... something or other. So I have to buy a bottle of each and mix it myself. What is the world coming to?
Labels:
general
Thursday, March 13, 2003
Wednesday, March 12, 2003
So a friend asks me how to fix his spreadsheet, and after a 20-second conversation on the phone, I say I can't really do telephone diagnosis. He mails me the spreadsheet, it's a border problem, which I talk him through how to fix in the second 20 seconds.
Like all Microsoft goodness, if you know, it's easy, if you don't know, you have to phone my friend M, who is a Microsoft accredited trainer. I feel like I know very little myself, but I can find out anything. That's the new kind of knowledge - no knowledge at all. We're all hubs. Or, like, a thin client (ironic, in my case). Or, perhaps, just a thin brain.
Like all Microsoft goodness, if you know, it's easy, if you don't know, you have to phone my friend M, who is a Microsoft accredited trainer. I feel like I know very little myself, but I can find out anything. That's the new kind of knowledge - no knowledge at all. We're all hubs. Or, like, a thin client (ironic, in my case). Or, perhaps, just a thin brain.
Labels:
general
Tuesday, March 11, 2003
Remember those people I didn't take a job with? Well, I sent them an (agreed) invoice for the work I did six weeks ago, chased it two weeks ago, and was faithfully promised a cheque by last week. Today I get a call from some gopher. They can't process the check because... I'd addressed it to Stupid Company plc, and it needed to be addressed to Stupid Company Business Group plc. Am I happy I don't work there? Guess?
Labels:
general
In April 2002 I went to my doctor about a small bump on my body I wanted to get removed. He got me an appointment at the Royal Free in about August. I saw a dermatolgist who said it wasn't urgent, and I would have to get a routine appointment. They gave me an appointment for the end of March 2003 (eight months). Today, I get a letter from the hospital dated 28th February and allgedly sent first class, saying my appointment has changed to the end of March 2004. Which is pretty much two years since my first enquiry. I called up to see if there was anything they could do, and was told that on the 7th March the hospital changed my appointment again to October 2003. That's good, apparently.
I know it's non-urgent, and that we have scarce medical resources, but I'm committed to the NHS, don't have health insurance, and just feel like it's a shame that I have to wait eighteen months to get an appointment to talk about getting something done. In fact, it's this kind of stuff that health insurance is good for.
I know it's non-urgent, and that we have scarce medical resources, but I'm committed to the NHS, don't have health insurance, and just feel like it's a shame that I have to wait eighteen months to get an appointment to talk about getting something done. In fact, it's this kind of stuff that health insurance is good for.
Labels:
general
The House of Elliot - my all-time favourite TV series. It's Pollyana, but with better clothes, for the twentieth century.
Labels:
general
Friday, March 07, 2003
Things I've done recently:
- The Magdalene Sisters (last night) - or, as it should be more rightly known, the Maudlin Sisters. It's good in a holocaust-movie-no-they-didn't kinda way, but the narrative doesn't really hang together, and there' sno payoff. You go through all their really shit, sadistic experiences, and then: nothing. Geraldine McEwan was fabulous though. Sacry, but great.
- The Hours - a week or so back, with S - I think I'm the only person I know who didn't enjoy this. Worthly, overhyped, and I could see the join in Nicole's nose.
- Jewish Book Week - Tom Segev being interviewed by Jonny Freedland. I didn't even know about post-Zionism or the New Historians Went with Jaq, who is back in the country for a week or so, and because I wore my (new, pink, Tevye meets Huggy Bear) hat for fashion reasons, but she wears hers for other reasons, we looked like a hat marketing company.
- Tupperware party - I misinformed you: they're stopping trading in the UK. Turns out I'm a tuppersoul, in a post-feminist, ironic way, of course.
Labels:
general
And I just hear some (war enabled american) talk about clear and present danger. Next thing we know it'll be apocalypse now.
Labels:
general
You've heard about Eye-raq (to rhyme with irate) - this morning, Radio 4 brings you...... I-wrock.
Labels:
general
Thursday, March 06, 2003
Tom Got Me Thinking
Don't I ever? As you know, I write quite a lot about ladies' underwear (which is clearly better than travelling the world in ladies underwear) and so I come in the top ten for quite a few underwear-related searches. Someone mailed me saying "hey sasha, I'm a UK-based underwear retailer, would you write about me if I gave you a free thong?"
My first thought was, I'm not a thong kinda gal. I won't go into detail, but there just not very comfortable. We emailed a little, and she's happy to send me any underwear in my size. So then I thought, maybe I could write about them, because they're a cute little company, and I like independent women and growing businesses. But I'd have to say they'd given me a free gift, otherwise it would be disengenuous. I've never got anything free in my life (unless you include when I worked for a company that incentivised you with House of Fraser vouchers: company - £23m profit, you - £75 of vouchers that you have to declare on your tax return anyway. Gee, thanks).
Then I did what I always do when I don't actually know what to do - nothing.
What do you think?
Don't I ever? As you know, I write quite a lot about ladies' underwear (which is clearly better than travelling the world in ladies underwear) and so I come in the top ten for quite a few underwear-related searches. Someone mailed me saying "hey sasha, I'm a UK-based underwear retailer, would you write about me if I gave you a free thong?"
My first thought was, I'm not a thong kinda gal. I won't go into detail, but there just not very comfortable. We emailed a little, and she's happy to send me any underwear in my size. So then I thought, maybe I could write about them, because they're a cute little company, and I like independent women and growing businesses. But I'd have to say they'd given me a free gift, otherwise it would be disengenuous. I've never got anything free in my life (unless you include when I worked for a company that incentivised you with House of Fraser vouchers: company - £23m profit, you - £75 of vouchers that you have to declare on your tax return anyway. Gee, thanks).
Then I did what I always do when I don't actually know what to do - nothing.
What do you think?
Labels:
general
Here's a thought: you're a guy running a business in a slightly gritty area of north London. Then someone gets murdered on your premises. The police come, seal off the area, close off your business. How long does that go on for? Do you get compensated for lost business?
Labels:
general
Wednesday, March 05, 2003
Because life, allegedly, goes on, I am off to a tupperware party. Apparently it's a retro seventies thing with cheese and pineapple on sticks. Tupperware parties are going out of style, apparently - from next month, you won't be able to go to one, so this is some kind of plastic swansong. I have an order already from my Mum for a blue-handled potato peeler (they're the best). The irony of the whole thing is that the women who is the "tupperware lady" was the Women's Officer at our hostesses students' union. How life moves on.
Labels:
general
Murder, She Wrote
Seeing as David's already mentioned it, I might as well say that someone was murdered in the petrol station near my house last night. I'm very freaked out. Also, it's very hard to get around because the Broadway is blocked off and there's traffic all over the shop. I'm a little surprised that I didn't notice it when I went out about 8.30am, but I was going in a townward direction.
Scroll down the Standard piece and read this:
"Local residents claimed crack dealers and addicts had begun using nearby street corners, making the area increasingly violent."
It's just not true - not in a NIMBY/NIMFY way, but in a just not true way. I've lived around here for nearly ten years, I feel safe walking around at night, even if there is a fair amount of local colour. Sure, you see lots of drunk people weaving their way down from Cricklewood when the pubs shut (and many of them congregate at my bus stop), but I've never once seen a drug exchange happen (and I would recognise one). Guess the Standard need to write something, and it can't be "man murdered in boring urban area."
In other news, my back is really hurting, and I'm off to see a cranial osteopath, but I'll have to walk there as there's gridlock due to the murder enquiry.
Seeing as David's already mentioned it, I might as well say that someone was murdered in the petrol station near my house last night. I'm very freaked out. Also, it's very hard to get around because the Broadway is blocked off and there's traffic all over the shop. I'm a little surprised that I didn't notice it when I went out about 8.30am, but I was going in a townward direction.
Scroll down the Standard piece and read this:
"Local residents claimed crack dealers and addicts had begun using nearby street corners, making the area increasingly violent."
It's just not true - not in a NIMBY/NIMFY way, but in a just not true way. I've lived around here for nearly ten years, I feel safe walking around at night, even if there is a fair amount of local colour. Sure, you see lots of drunk people weaving their way down from Cricklewood when the pubs shut (and many of them congregate at my bus stop), but I've never once seen a drug exchange happen (and I would recognise one). Guess the Standard need to write something, and it can't be "man murdered in boring urban area."
In other news, my back is really hurting, and I'm off to see a cranial osteopath, but I'll have to walk there as there's gridlock due to the murder enquiry.
Labels:
general
Tuesday, March 04, 2003
The switchboard operator at Dyson, a company that has had national and international awards for all sorts of things, can't put me through to the PR department because "they're not on the system." The system, you gotta rock it, or it gets you. Or in this case, doesn't.
Labels:
general
Monday, March 03, 2003
Which reminds me - why do people organising Psychic Fayres advertise? Surely everyone should just know where it is?
Labels:
general
Don't you hate it when you call people and their assistants say "will he know what it's in connection with?" I'm so inclined to respond "only if he's psychic."
Labels:
general
Sunday, March 02, 2003
Saturday, March 01, 2003
You know that saying "love is blind"? I've been thinking about it - mostly, I would say love is partially-sighted, but in some cases, love is so disabled as to have an orange badge.
Labels:
general
Why is it that when I don't copy-and-paste before I post, blogger's always buggered?
Labels:
general
Whither War
(Headline purely for alliterative/entertainment purposes). Do you think when the war happens, it'll be Falklands-stylee (ie miles away, lots of shouting, no direct day-to-day impact), or more Second World War? Will we have to melt down our earings and railings to make bombs, and will women all have to give up their jobs and go and work in munitions factories, and wear strange scarfs knotted at the top of their head, making almost everyone look unattractive? I hope it's not the latter.
(Headline purely for alliterative/entertainment purposes). Do you think when the war happens, it'll be Falklands-stylee (ie miles away, lots of shouting, no direct day-to-day impact), or more Second World War? Will we have to melt down our earings and railings to make bombs, and will women all have to give up their jobs and go and work in munitions factories, and wear strange scarfs knotted at the top of their head, making almost everyone look unattractive? I hope it's not the latter.
Labels:
general
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)